Opening argument sentence; In 1989 three boats become a floating dock, two of which are D.N.R. in the pulling over of driver Thomas Forystek whom is removed beyond that point from the situation for said B.W.I., be changed to grand theft auto, providing proof by way of the D.N.R. testimony going out of their way to conceal the theft contingent on three parties, in fourth surname's the docking home owner who's Jr. legal name and front yard is where the incident occurs, with in whose boat vehicle information number belongs not to the driving party, and in turn putting minors in focus of care taking an adult in assisted B.W.I. after stopped in the lake, given the decision of continue to assured D.W.I. before parting with the irresponsible party, assuring as community protection and role model that there of, drives my passengers home against my better judgment in one D.W.I. and each count of D.U.I. upon rap sheet there for showing prelude to perquisite inquisition as to sobriety, escapes truth, reduction to a single D.U.I., or B.W.I. my own, the M.A.D.D. panel has spoken legally defined the owner of the boat and home the boat was stolen from, as two separate people having the same legal name that of a D.U.I. lawyer named John Price, fair for intervention in minor custody of three at this day and point in all abiding would could be quicker, then returns his boat V.I.N. dated and back any insurance, wake responsibly.
Opening argument: In 2006 in St. Paul the landlord/tenant bi-laws of security deposits which deems that in the event a tenant is unable to attend his/her responsibilities that the contents of the apartment become trash, were forfeit to a third party, Mary Valley and a individual from the Nami organization, after I was removed from the premises and not in the apartment itself by local authorities via an ambulance, was un-equivalently disrespecting in protecting the privacy of individuals responsible for security deposit, essentially delivering it to the third party, least admittance that the security deposit was not adequate placed upon the complexes responsibility for the local authorities, whom should also uphold the responsibility that taking trash out of shared tenant trash bins is illegal, for the complex to explain.
Opening Statement: Having not charged, nor appeared in court, due to arriving on time, with out of ordinary parameters of facility security, a bailiff has no rightful job opportunity in the interception of a individuals appearance before a court of law, with out reform of the room, by way attending the individuals court date, as a bailiff, whom is to secure the court room by very title different then a security guard or otherwise local police officer, whom is not a bailiff, by arraigning outside of the operable parameters of the court room, before the individual enters the room, by which way court does not go to, then “come” is by way of command you indicate your court operable with in United States of America court outside of the room and you shall, as U.S. court does not return to orderly to hold U.S. court, or declared affirmative., as well by going out of your own way to deliver myself to a further court then the closest to the residency and incident of occurrence, then may as well be another country too, say plus extended of curtsey distance, applicable not with in the U.S.A.